Cox Seeks Supreme Court Ruling
This is a US news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Sony news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Cable firm Cox Communications. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest major copyright infringement verdicts news, ISP news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
copyright infringement lawsuitArs Technica
•ISP to Supreme Court: We shouldn’t have to disconnect users accused of piracy
87% Informative
Cox Communications is trying to overturn a ruling in a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by Sony .
The case began in 2018 when Sony and other music copyright holders sued Cox, claiming that it didn't adequately fight piracy on its network.
A US District Court jury in the Eastern District of Virginia ruled in December 2019 that Cox must pay $1 billion in damages to the major record labels.
Cox wants the Supreme Court to rule that ISPs shouldn't have to disconnect broadband users accused of piracy.
VR Score
90
Informative language
89
Neutral language
96
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links