Intel CEO's AI Decision Missed

This is a OpenAI news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to John Sutter news.

OpenAI news

For more OpenAI news, you can click here:

more OpenAI news

John Sutter news

For more John Sutter news, you can click here:

more John Sutter news

News about Ai startups

For more Ai startups news, you can click here:

more Ai startups news

MSN news

For more news from MSN, you can click here:

more news from MSN

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai startups, you might also like this article about

Intel CEO Paul Otellini

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Apple CEO Steve Jobs news, Intel news, news about Ai startups, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

chipmaker Intel today

Fortune

•

Intel is the latest Fortune 500 giant to test the ‘4 wrong CEOs’ rule

Summary

Nutrition label

70% Informative

John Sutter : Intel had a chance to buy a 15% stake in AI -developing company OpenAI for $1 billion .

He says Intel CEO Bob Swan judged the potential deal a loser in 2017 and 2018 .

The Intel saga is a grim reminder that some of America ’s greatest companies have succumbed to the four -wrong-CEOs disease.

Sutter says a single CEO would have a tough time going through five stages of decline.

Most often they’re intelligent, highly accomplished, and motivated to succeed, but experience or temperament unsuited them for the job in that company at that time. Four of them in a row is as unlikely as four of a kind in poker, but in the corporate world it doesn’t happen by chance. Ultimately blame must fall on those fallible humans in the board room. This story was originally featured on Fortune.com .

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

likely offensive

Hate speech

not hateful